Kentucky Derby: Where are the Superstars
The Kentucky Derby has had its share of controversies and huge longshot winners since 2009, especially in recent years. It also has had a scarcity of major stars win the race. So, has the Derby become more of a show than a meaningful race? It’s still too early to answer that, but it is worth discussing. ~ Steve Haskin
Kentucky Derby: Where are the Superstars?
By Steve Haskin
As the second season for 3-year-olds approaches, we have to wonder if we’re about to see any blossoming superstars emerge? You remember what a superstar is, right? And I presume you remember when they used to begin their path to superstardom in the Kentucky Derby. Well, maybe not on both counts unless you’re an old timer like yours truly.
Has there been a better year for a 3-year-old to rise up the ranks and become a bona fide superstar? There sure doesn’t look like there is a Breeders’ Cup Cup Classic-type of horse who can claim that title, with the possible exception of Cody’s Wish if he proves as effective stretching out to nine and 10 furlongs.
Wouldn’t it be great if we can find such a horse who ran in the Kentucky Derby, a race that used to go beyond its iconic status in American culture and actually produce not only great horses but all-time greats.
Look at the greatest two minutes in sports and its recent results one has to wonder if the Derby is now more about the glory than the story. There will always be glory winning the Derby and it will forever remain the sport’s most sought after prize and a piece of Americana. But does it still tell the story of the sport as it did when it showcased its superstars, such as Secretariat, Citation, Seattle Slew, Affirmed, Count Fleet, Spectacular Bid, Whirlaway, Gallant Fox, Assault, etc.?
So, what has happened to the Run for the Roses when it comes to producing superstars and all-time greats? Is it the race itself? Perhaps it simply is in a prolonged and inexplicable dry spell. Is it the breed? Could it be possible that we no longer are capable of producing all-time great horses, with the sirens of the breeding farms and big bucks luring owners and their horses away from the racetrack at the end of their 3-year-old campaign.
Or could it be the Derby simply has become too difficult to win and no longer a true indicator of who the best 3-year-old is? Every starter in a 19 or 20-horse field has to qualify on points. If you look at the Derby fields in the 1970s when you had several all-time greats, the average size of their field was 12, so post positions, traffic, and just getting lucky didn’t apply nearly as much as it does today.
How drastically have times changed when it comes to the Derby? In a nine-year period, from 1972 to 1980, seven Kentucky Derby winners were elected to the Hall of Fame. In the past 33 years, only three Derby winners have been elected to the Hall of Fame and none them are considered comparable to the horses mentioned above. It must be said that two of those three horses — California Chrome and Silver Charm — gained entrance into the Hall of Fame by racing and continuing their success at ages 4 and 5. So I’m afraid this alarming statistic will not improve anytime soon, if ever.
Since 2016, excluding the 2020 Derby run in September because of Covid, the last seven Derby winners have gone on to win just five of their 23 starts, with three of those wins coming from Mandaloun, who inherited his Derby win after the drug positive and disqualification of Medina Spirit. And one of Mandaloun’s subsequent wins came on a disqualification. The other two came from Justify, who won the Preakness and Belmont and then was gone. So of those last seven winners, five of them did not win a race after the Derby. Of course, we still have this year’s winner Mage, who has only run once and should win his share of races if he can duplicate his Derby performance. It also says a lot that the last seven Derby winners made an average of only three starts following the Derby.
Is this just one of those temporary downward trends? Well, let’s go back from 2000 to 2013. Those 14 Derby winners had a record of 19 wins from 84 starts following the Derby, while finishing out of the money 42 times.
Yes, we have had superstars American Pharoah and California Chrome and to a lesser degree Justify, who whizzed by in an instant, win the Derby. But it is unlikely any of those will ever be considered an all-time great. And Pharoah and Chrome were almost a decade ago. Since then we have had a drug positive, two disqualifications, including the first ever stewards disqualification, and the second biggest longshot to win in the history of the race.
The reason I am bringing all this up is not to demean the Derby. It has given me too many special moments over the years and it will always be the race horsemen want to win, bettors want to bet, and non racing fans want to watch.
One thing we have learned about the Derby during this century, and this year in particular, is that the merits of a horse often have no bearing on where they finish in the Derby. We have seen too many horses finish up the track and come back and win classics and major stakes.
In this year’s Derby, the pace of the race was brutal with fractions of :22 1/5, :45 3/5, and 1:10 flat. Verifying, who led by a head in all three calls, was virtually eased, finishing 16th. Kingsbarns, who was second by a head the first two calls and still second after three-quarters, faded to 14th, beaten over 25 lengths. Reincarnate, who was third by a half-length after a quarter and third by one length after a half and three-quarters, finished 13th, beaten over 24 lengths. Normally one would think it would take a while to recover from battling on the lead in a 20-horse field through blistering fractions and then tiring badly.
But Verifying came back to finish second, beaten a half-length, in the Matt Winn Stakes before winning the Indiana Derby. Kingsbarns came back to finish second, beaten a neck, in the Pegasus Stakes. Reincarnate came back to win the Los Alamitos Derby by 2 1/2 lengths. Another horse close to that scorching pace, Two Phil’s, who was 1 1/2 lengths back at the half and two lengths back at the three-quarters and still ran a remarkable race to finish second, came back to win the Ohio Derby by 5 3/4 lengths.
So three of the horses who were close to that suicidal pace came back to win Derbys, while another was beaten in a photo. Two Phil’s, unfortunately, has been retired with an injury, but the horses who finished 13th, 14th, and 16th all came back and quickly reestablished their reputation, as if the Kentucky Derby never happened.
The same thing happened to Palace Malice in 2013, who cooked himself with a :45 1/5 half in the Derby before tiring to finish 12th. He then bounced back to win the Belmont Stakes by 3 1/4 lengths.
In the 2022 Derby, Cyberknife, who was only 3 1/2 lengths off a suicidal :45 1/5 half before fading to 18th, beaten 43 lengths, and Taiba, who was only three lengths back at the half before tiring to finish 12th, beaten 18 lengths, came back to finish noses apart in the Haskell Invitational in track-record time, with Cyberknife preceding the Haskell with a victory in the Matt Winn Stakes and then getting beat a head by the older Cody’s Wish in the Breeders’ Cup Dirt Mile. Here are two more horses badly beaten in the Kentucky Derby after chasing a blistering pace who became stars.
We have seen other horses shrug off terrible performances in the Derby, such as Snow Chief, who romped in the Preakness; Hansel, who won the Preakness and Belmont Stakes; and Commendable, Lemon Drop Kid, and Creator, who won the Belmont. You can add horses like Point Given, Birdstone, Lookin At Lucky, Oxbow, Union Rags, Editor’s Note, and War of Will, who won classics after finishing off the board in the Derby. The first two also went on to win the Travers.
So does all this mean horses who are good in the Derby are not that good and horses who are bad in the Derby are not that bad? If so, how do you handicap the race and how do you handicap horses coming out of the race?
For the casual fan, the Derby has left a lasting impact on a national scale twice this century. Once when the 50-1 shot Mine That Bird won and the race was made into a major motion picture and the other when the 80-1 shot Rich Strike won, with a motion picture now in the works. California Chrome’s story had the making of an excellent movie, but that opportunity came and went. Movies like Secretariat, 50-1, and Seabiscuit all ended with an epic victory, There really was no place to end a movie about Chrome.
But popularity and Hollywood interest aside, the purpose of this column was merely to pose a question about the relevancy of the Kentucky Derby strictly as a horse race now compared to years ago and how to evaluate the horses who win it and the horses who lose it…badly. So whether you finished in the first five in this year’s Derby or the last five, good luck the rest of the year and may one of you turn out to be a superstar and, yes, race next year. The Derby needs you.
Next weeks column will be a tribute to Funny Cide.
Racing historian, author, and award-winning retired journalist for the Daily Racing Form and The Blood-Horse, Steve Haskin was inducted into the National Museum of Racing Hall of Fame’s Media Roll of Honor in 2016. Known for his racing knowledge and insightful prose, he has been an exclusive contributor to Secretariat.com since 2020.
Mage The Magnificent has arrived at Saratoga.
He looks great! Does not appear that the Haskell took much out of him.
Gustavo is such a gentleman.
He thanked everyone for taking such great care of him, his team and Mage at Monmouth Park.
Video posted on Twitter by trainer.
Thanks Steve for a thought provoking article backed up with data. I suspected this was the case regarding the KD. I’ve shared my opinion previously regarding KD point system and management. Point system has pretty much taken out all female horses from participating, and taken away the significance of a 7 furlong prep race early in the season. Also, giving heavy points to races that really have no business being involved. Thanks again!
Jeff, I agree that the points system needs a makeover. But as for fillies, they can run in points races to qualify. Before the points system, Serena’s Song won the Jim Beam Stakes before her 16th-place finish in the derby. Winning Colors won the SA Derby before winning the Kentucky Derby. Genuine Risk was in the Wood before winning the Ky Derby.
Funny Cide column will be posted tonight.
Nest is the 4 to 5 favorite and Clairiere at odds on right now … 12 minutes to the exciting showdown between two brilliant champions…
Champion Nest wins the Shuvee easily over Clairiere taking the lead in their division.
Clairiere had previously defeated Nest by 3 lengths in the Longines Breeders’ Cup Distaff won by the Champion Older Dirt Female last year… but Nest looks to be stronger as a 4 year old now…!
*Malathaat
Todd Pletcher may have another daughter of Curlin as a potential Stakes horse in Camera ( CURLIN – CASSIES DREAMER, BY FLATTER ) who is debuting in the 6th race (4:06 ET) at Saratoga today. She only needs a clean break to attempt an easy winning debut… there a couple of other good prospects in that race.
Camera is a $1,050,000 acquisition by Eclipse Thoroughbred Partners/Whitehorse/Madaket ownership at the 2022 Fasig-Tipton Saratoga Select Yearling Sales…
Horse didn’t lift a hoof. Terrible effort
He didn’t really have much of a chance after the bad start and stumble.
For anyone interested in what happened to Rich Strike:
Per his owner Rick Dawson as of 2 days ago, Rich Strike is still in rehab and receiving treatment at Margeaux Farm under the direction of R&R since May. He will go back for another re-examination in 30 days.
While Mr. Dawson has not given any information as to the nature of the injury but said he has had the injury a long time and probably explains his poor performance in his last two starts. He said additionally that he was advised by R&R that had he continued to race him with the injury there could have been catastrophic results.
I’ve been thinking it’s bone bruising which would be consistent with what you’re describing. Could be a couple other things too though, we probably won’t be told. It does beg the question as to why he was being put in races in that condition.
JanBer, reading BTW I tend to agree with you that most likely is bone bruising.
Not an uncommon condition in Thoroughbreds as I have read.
If you recall the pre-purchase exam (by Taylor Made) for California Chrome revealed bone bruising.
He spent roughly 4 months on pasture rest before returning successfully to racing.
Not sure how long Rich Strike has been out of action, 3 months maybe?
Wishing him the best!
The Haskell was a Travers tuneup for Mage. He didn’t resume training until 5 weeks after the Preakness. Obviously, 10 furlongs will suit him just fine.
My takeaway from the Haskell: I’m looking forward to the return of Practical Move. Maybe I should say HOPING for his return.
I find very interesting the topic of horses rebounding after a dismal performance in the Derby. Steve’s examples motivated me to look for other notable cases. Below are the achievements of some renowned horses after their subpar Derby.
Counterpoint 11th in 1951: 1951 Horse of the Year. 1951 Champion 3-Year-Old Colt.
Personality 8th in 1970: 1970 Horse of the Year, 1970 Champion 3-Year-Old Colt
Gulch 6th in 1987: 1988 Champion Sprinter
Seeking the Gold 7th in 1988: won the Dwyer, Peter Pan and the Super Derby, 2nd in the Haskell and BCC
Holy Bull 12th in 1994: Hall of Fame – 2001,Eclipse Award 1994 Horse of the Year, Eclipse Award 1994 Champion 3-Year-Old Colt
Tabasco Cat 6th in 1994: won Preakness and Belmont, 2nd by a neck in the BCC
Skip Away 12th in 1996: Hall of Fame – 2004, Eclipse Award 1998 Horse of the Year, Eclipse Award 1998 Champion Older Horse, Eclipse Award 1997 Champion Older Horse, Eclipse Award 1996 Champion 3-Year-Old Colt
Summer Bird 6th in 2009: Eclipse Award 2009 Champion 3-Year-Old Colt
Flower Alley 9th in 2005: won the Jim Dandy and the Travers, 2nd in the BCC
Whitmore (g) 19th 2016: Won five consecutive races after the Derby including the G3’s Count Fleet and Maryland Sprints. Eclipse Award 2020 Champion Male Sprinter.
These notorious cases show that every horse are entitled to “one bad day at the office” …
Best Pal was beaten by more than two lengths in the 1991 Derby…he was prominent at the top level of older horses for years…..Free House was beaten a couple lengths, in third, came back and lost Preakness by a nose and Belmont by 1 1/2…..won Santa Anita Hcp wire to wire withstanding several challenges, and Pacific Classic.
Snow Chief was 11th in the Derby….won Preakness by five lengths, won Jersey Derby (gr1, 10 fur) by two lengths…won Strub…won Oaklawn Hcp….
Nice list! I must add Slew O’ Gold, who you mentioned in your decades list. He finished 4th in the derby and went on to a superb Hall of Fame career, winning the Woodward and JCGC twice each, the Whitney, and the Marlboro Cup.
Thanks for the reply Roy…. you are right about Slew O’Gold great rebound… I was just following Steve’s criterion of picking horses finishing after the first five …
There other extreme cases like Granville who lost his jockey and Thunder Snow who decided to do rodeo in the Derby and went on to do brilliantly afterwards…
Again, horse racing is so rich that we could be talking about it for days…LOL
Imagine if we include the great fillies and mares of all time in our discussions…
There’d be no time for eating and sleeping.
Included in the elite club of derby also-rans (Gulch and Whitmore) that went on to BC Sprint and Eclipse Sprinter championships were Trinniberg and Artax.
Yes Roy … good observations.
Artax had won the Santa Catalina and San Felipe Stakes wire to wire … the latter over Real Quiet no less! The son of Marquetry could not do better than 3rd in the Santa Anita Derby behind Indian Charlie and Real Quiet.
Trinniberg was the last pure sprinter to run in the Derby right before the point system was implemented (in 2013).
GRR (skipping Travers) and Arabian Knight going back to California. Mage going straight to Saratoga.
Where did you hear all that?
On Twitter. A sportswriter, Matt something, last name begins with an H I think.
Just to clarify, he did not say AK skipping the Travers.
Read it from another source this morning.
Yeah I just read he is unlikely on Bloodhorse.
Yes, that was the other source for GRR.
I need to and will do better naming sources.
Steve, sorry you weren’t clued in earlier on this Lynda is also the Hedda Hopper/ Cindy Adam’s of this blog.
Brilliance that begets brilliance is a rare thing, Geaux Rocket Ride, Candy Ride out of an Uncle Mo mare you wonder what may become of a breeding like that—so far so good….
AK pushed in deep end,considering zero races for over 6 mo. Insane!
Congrats to Richard Mandella and GRR (sorry, can’t get the name spelled correct). A very, very nice win over a very, very nice field.
I agree John.
Congrats to Shotgunhottie (by Gun Runner).
These Gun Runners are like their sire, they age like fine wine.
I think the Distaff will be very interesting this year.
Terrific ride by Big Money Mike! Horse was rank, at the 6 furlong marker, Mike held his ground….Mandella said two months ago—before The Affirmed—they were looking at running in The Haskell….and they were ready….
A real horseman.
My bad, I mistakenly posted Geaux Rocket Ride was rank early on the race, and I was looking at Salute the Stars! Mike brought his mount to the outside, in a masterful move!..
AK never had a chance!
Mike, we get it. Arabian Knight lost. Now is time to lose your Baffert Derangement Syndrome.
Will do ‘John’,when u lose obvious hero worship.
Congrats Geaux Rocket Ride and Wet Paint.
Well this is my take on this year’s Haskell. I think for Kentucky Derby winner, Mage, to have a chance in this race he going to have to have a “hot” front-end pace. He is better off coming from way off the pace (IMO) then trying to run with the pace like he tried in the Preakness. The early pace in this race looks to be set by Arabian Knight. In his only 2 race came out of the gate as if shot out of cannon. Would not be surprised to see Awesome Strong and Extra Anejo pressing the pace. I think Geaux Rocket Rides and Tapit Trice sitting just off the pace with Mage near the back. The mystery horse in this is Salute the Stars who ran a really good last race last time out. My other thought in this race is Extra Anejo… Will Asmussen elect to push the pace on Arabian Knight or if he sees others going with Arabian Knight have the jock pull back and come later in the race.
Well here is how I am going to play it.
Superfecta key $.50 ( I know, last of the big-time spenders … LOL)
1 Arabian Knight,
2 Tapit Trice, Extra Anejo, Geaux Rocket Ride (money Mike on him)
3 Tapit Trice, Extra Anejo, Geaux Rocket Ride , Salute the Stars
4 All but Arabian Knight and Awesome Strong (hope I don’t get burned here but I think he is in the race as a rabbit)
Good luck to you all and may the best horse win !!!
We have liftoff! Cheers for Geaux Rocket Ride, Mike Smith, and Richard Mandella!
You were close, Downthestretch! I was happy to see Geaux Rocket Ride win. Mandella prepped him perfectly and it paid off. Both Mage and Arabian Knight (2nd and 3rd) were coming off long layoffs. Could be a different story in the Travers, but I liked what I saw of the winner. Tapit Trice (4th?) needs a confidence builder, in my opinion.
I think Tapit Trice needs weight and some R&R.
LYNDA KING.. you are the Bonnie Ledbetter of this blog!!!
LOL
Although Arabian Knight finished gamely for third not sure I would send him to the Travers. You are correct on Mandella and Mike Smith perfect set up. Mage on got the pace he need but was not going to pass the winner today. A little disappointed with Salute the Stars and Tapit Trice race.
Ms Blacktype, unless Baffert can get this horse to “rate” the east coast will just run him into the ground… remember the Travers is another 1/8 of a mile. I think Arabian Knight would be better suited for the BC dirt mile. Have Reincarnate and Arabian Lion for the Travers and National Treasure and Fort Bragg for the Pennsylvania Derby at Parx
Cue excuses for Arabian K.
Thank you for an enjoyable and thought-provoking column. But the thoughts it provoked for me were a little bit different. I don’t think this issue is new and I don’t think it’s a problem.
First let me say I have loved the Kentucky Derby with a passion for 60 years. My friends all know that it is my favorite annual event and that Derby Day is my favorite day of the year. I have a collection of quotations about the Derby, and many of them make the same distinction that you made–as David Alexander put it in 1963, “The Kentucky Derby is a horse race like the Preakness and the Belmont as well as a state of mind like Greenwich Village and Zen Buddhism.” I relate to it unapologetically as a state of mind. I find it impossible to think of it simply as a horse race because it’s not that simple. But it is possible to evaluate the quality of the winners and losers.
It is true that the 1970’s produced an amazing group of Derby winners with three Triple Crowns plus Spectacular Bid and Riva Ridge. No decade since can compare to that, and with the possible exception of the 1940’s no earlier decade can either. The 70’s were an anomaly, but if you go back a little farther, you find the same issues that this column discusses. In the 1950’s Derbies were won by horses like Middleground, Determine, Count Turf, and Needles–names that are not likely to come up at the breakfast table 70 years later. Derbies in the 50’s were lost by Native Dancer, Nashua, Bold Ruler, Round Table, and Gallant Man. The 1960’s produced some remarkable horses, but Kelso, Buckpasser, Graustark, and Dr. Fager didn’t run in the Derby and Damascus got beat.
I don’t think the Kentucky Derby has ever been a definitive predicter of greatness, but I don’t think any race can be, and I don’t think it has to. I prefer to enjoy it for what it is. Today’s horses, in general, may not measure up to those of the past, and we all have our own theories as to why. But I don’t think Derby performances have much to do with the big picture. Some good horses lose and some not-so-good horses win and they always will.
The difference is that now we dont get superstars who run in the Derby. It wasnt a problem in 1950s because Native Dancer, Nashua, Bold Ruer, Round Table, Gallant Man, and Sword Dancer all ran in it and all are in the Hall of Fame. I’ll add Damascus to that list. The column wasnt so much about horses that win the Derby but horses that run in it. And we just dont get superstars who win it or run in it anymore.. I believe the Derby indeed was a predictor of greatness.
Provocative article… a wealth of fond historical memories is rekindled whenever I see the word superstars in Steve’s columns.
When you have a promising two-year old it is just natural to aim at making him the next Triple Crown champion. It is a supreme accolade that would not only make the athlete a hero but would also elevate his team to celebrity status …
It is also notable that for most of the 20th century the older-horse division and the handicap races were as important as the Triple Crown. That hallmark mentality was an important building block of the golden eras of horse racing.
There have been innumerable exchanges between Steve and many of his followers about how horse racing has changed over the last quarter century. Almost unchanged is the elevation of the champion two-year-old as the winter favorite to attempt the triple crown. But the journey to stardom or greatness entails earning championships at ages of two, three and four… that is the benchmark of legends and one that will not be met but the modern icons.
The equine heroes of the last century set records and ran faster than any horse has ever run before. They competed with and defeated other Hall of Fame members while running as frequently as they could.
Their supremacy sustained for at least three racing seasons offered the illusion of them transcending mortality.
They became super stars because they ran with a sense of destiny!
And thanks to the sportsmanship of their owners, we have a golden standard for greatness. The feats of the iron horses have made racing history richer.
Cigar and Skip Away were the last horses reminiscent of the golden age of racing. Some may include California Chrome and Gun Runner as the last remnants of the epic 50’s, 60’s and 70’s.
In modern days a champion two-year-old needs only to win 2 or 3 more Grade one races to be prematurely retired… and if he can win the Triple Crown, the Travers and the Breeder’s Cup Classic then he will be automatically branded a superstar securing induction to the Hall of Fame.
The bright side of this new paradigm is that the historians like Steve will have an easier job chronicling their careers…
I would like to share some figures about superstars and the Derby since it is Steve’s theme this week…
This is my personal list of MALE stars and superstars by decades since 1950. The asterisk denotes Derby entrants, and their number is written between Parentheses.
2020-2022 Fligthline……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..1
2010-2019 Wise Dan, Justify*, Gun Runner*, California Chrome*, American Pharoah*, Arrogate……………….6 (4)
2000-2010 Curlin*, Invasor, Ghostzapper, Point Given*, Tiznow, Barbaro*…………………………………..6 (3)
1990-1999 Cigar, Holy Bull*, Skip Away*, Silver Charm*, A.P. Indy…………………………………………………5 (3)
1980-1989 Sunday Silence*,Easy Goer*,Alysheba*,John Henry, Slew o’ Gold*,Precisionist………………………………..6 (4)
1970-1979 Ack Ack,Riva Ridge*,Secretariat*,Forego*,Seattle Slew*,Affirmed*,Alydar*,Spectacular Bid*………………8 (7)
1960-1969 Kelso,Buckpasser,Damascus*,Dr. Fager,Northern Dancer*,Arts and Letters*,Carry Back*…………………….7 (4)
1950-1959 Round Table*,Bold Ruler *, Gallant Man*,Swaps*,Nashua*, Native Dancer*, Tom Fool, Sword Dancer*…8 (7)
You can infer that until the mid-nineties greatness was still achieved through the test of time.
32 out of the 47 superstars, stars and champions listed here competed in the Derby and 16 won it.
But the Kentucky Derby isn’t everything!
Passing the Derby were the immortals like Man O’War, Dr. Fager, Buckpasser and other Hall of Famers, such as Colin, Sysonby, Equipoise, Challedon, Armed, and Stymie, also bypassed the Derby. Other renowned champions like Seabiscuit, Tom Fool, Kelso, Native Diver, never started in any of the Triple Crown races.
In fact the first superstar of this 2020-2029 decade is a horse that was not ready for the Triple Crown but was carefully managed and trained to make him literally invincible. I am not sure if Flightline will be elevated to the Hall of Fame but I am sure we won’t see 6 more thrilling Grade One feats. It would take a very long time to see another horse with such mythological aura.
Statistically we should expect at least to have 3 or 4 more stars in the next seven years… Cody’s Wish and Forte seem to have the upper hand in their respective divisions this year; I reckon that the best 3-year-old is among the ones who missed the Derby…
Good post. Your key word is sportsmanship. You cant have Hall of Famers unless yor run them.
Thanks Steve… Geaux Rocket Ride is a rising star bound to run next year for the incomparable Richard Mandella…
Eloquently put, Nelson. Your list of superstars are horses that I would consider great ones, in the old Bloodhorse vernacular and book of the same name. Both Steve’s column and your commentary are evidence that everyone with a potentially great horse (or just a good one) wants to win the Kentucky Derby for both practical reasons and the almost mystical hold it has on the racing world.
Thanks for the reply Ms Blacktype.
Every horse racing fan has his /her own favorite heroes… for instance some people may include in the topmost list horses like Tim Tam, Key to the Mint, Bold Forbes, Best Pal, Smarty Jones, Afleet Alex and even Big Brown…
Some argue that A.P. Indy as a runner should not be in the list of all-time-greats …
Sometimes there are horses heralded early as the next super star and they failed to fulfill that promise like Arazi and Favorite Trick…
The good thing is that American racing history is really rich with a myriad of marvelous horses to admire and idolize…
Excellent commentary Nelson. Thank you.
Most profound statement: ” greatness was still achieved through the test of time”.
Thanks Lynda… it actually is an expression I had heard/read many times from some Hall of Fame trainers and first-class owners…
Unbelievable! All charges dropped against Maria Borrell.
42 counts of animal abuse.
Disgusting. That’s all I can say right now Lynda.
Read the whole story… sounds like her father was the real culprit.
Her father’s situation was settled prior to this. Go to this story on US Racing.com
The horses were placed in her care, not her Father’s. They were both charged for animal abuse. He stayed and faced the music. When the arrest warrant was put out for Maria Borrell, she fled Kentucky.
I remember this case vividly as it was unfolding.
This happens all the time in animal welfare and abuse cases. The people lawyers up and convinces a judge that they are not guilty when the evidence is right there in broad daylight.
The evidence of abuse was “right there in broad daylight.” The evidence of Maria Borell’s responsibility was, according to the prosecutor and the judge, not as obvious. Would you feel better it the case went to trial and she was found not guilty?
Roy, I saw the photos and watched the videos of the horses as they were being removed from the property, the slimy green water tubs with standing green brackish water, the condition of some of the horses that required medical care.
And who are you to say that she would not have been convicted if she had a jury trial?
Kentucky had at the time almost totally non-existent animal welfare laws that offered no protections for horses.
Plus she ran to New York state and hid out for several years.
Nope, sorry, not you or anyone else can change my mind about this case.
Why are you restating the obvious about the condition of the horses? Nobody denies that. Prosecutors want convictions. They don’t go through the time and expense of a trial if they don’t believe a conviction is likely. I’ve read news reports of the case. Perhaps you would rather ignore the facts. According to reports, Ms. Borell was not in Kentucky at the time. Her father was. Kentucky did not have extradition for misdemeanors. She didn’t flee.
The horses were the real losers here. What kind of message does this send to the public?
Again read the story they did not prosecute her because the case against her was…. weak !!!
Take heart John. The 43 horses did land safely due to the efforts of dedicated horsemen and horse women like Mr. Rick Porter and Victoria of Fox Hill Farm.
The other silver lining is that the Kentucky state assembly passed Borrell’s Law in 2017 and former Governor Matt Blevins signed the bill into law. This law provides that horses and other animals forced in such situations of abuse and cruelty that people like Maria Borell and her Father put them in can be confiscated and placed in safe havens before the trial and these abusers can be forced to pay restitution.
There will be a court hearing in September for the final disposition of this case. If Maria Borrell gets her “get out of jail free card” there is still the possibility that the owners of these horses can bring a civil suit(s) against her and her Father.
Me personally, I would not entrust this woman or her Father to take care of a nest of hornets, much less train a horse or board one.
We see this far too often in many states. Prosecutors and Judges simply do not think that animal abuse such as these 43 horses endured is important.
There is now a Federal Law that certain animal abuse cases are a felony.
On a side note, Borrel’s trainers license in Kentucky was revoked because she failed to pay the fees. Her relationship with the stable she was working with in Florida was ended because she did not pay the grooms and stable help and her membership in USEF was suspended because she did address the warrants that were issued for her arrest in Kentucky.
Thanks Lynda, well said.
If the early 70s had a Vox Populai award it would have included a three-peat by the name of Cougar II…..Never was Racings top horse, but he danced and danced and danced some more….lugging hard left thru the stretch with his high-headed gait—usually flying faster than his rivals!..Stopping, and watching us, in the post parade, standing and staring until a spontaneous roar of approval! Danced with turf titans, always the crowd favorite I didn’t bet on Cougar but it was always great to watch him win, a spirit that I connected with, early on on this sport—if you can lose a bet and feel blessed for what you were gifted, in defeat: a magical Thoroughbred, moving cat-like thru the field, like…a big cat..
Cougars Santa Anita handicap win 1973 over Kennedy Road , Bicker etc was one for the ages ! His 1971 second to ack ack in the big cap was special too and is easy to find on you tube he was the sire of Kentucky derby winner 1982 Gato Del sol
Cougars 2cd in 72 big cap to triple bend was a fantastic race too
Cougar’s big chance at nationwide fame and enhancing his reputation was deprived him by the New York stewards.
Disqualified from first in 1971 Woodward Stakes. West Coast Scout moved to first. Cougar II won race by five lengths, but dropped
to third for causing interference in stretch run. Cougar II ridden by William Shoemaker. After the race Cougar II’s owner, Mary Jones, promised not to ride Shoemaker again on her horse (think that’s how the story goes). Nevertheless, it was an impressive performance by the horse from South America.
Steve,
As always another interesting and thought-provoking column. I waited on commenting on it until I saw who was going to enter “The Haskell” and what the odds on who would be favorite for it would be. And to your point, as you have written in this article, the winner of the Kentucky Derby doesn’t carry that aura of invincibility it once did. this year’s winner is co-2nd choice, and ironically the favorite in the race is trained by a man who touts the Kentucky Derby as one of the greatest races in America and once its biggest cheerleader is banned from running horses in it for the foreseeable future by an ownership (CDI) that despises the man. Because of this ban, I had no interest in this year’s KD nor will I have any for next year’s for the same reason.
Thanks for the article Steve, you are the BEST !!! Have a great week
I don’t believe that Steve said anything about an aura of invincibility. You can go back many decades – probably through the history of the Derby – and find numerous winners that weren’t the morning line favorite in the PREAKNESS, let alone in subsequent races.
Arabian Knight was not going to make the 2023 Derby regardless who trained him…
Just watched video of Tapit Trice arriving for the Haskell.
I could count every single rib, front to back, top to bottom.
He is one thin horse.
You rarely hear that about a Todd Pletcher horse. He’s always been a tall, long-legged horse.
Todd put him on a KETO diet after the Belmont
Hilarious, Downthestretch. And a total bet-against — for that an other reasons.
Thanks Ms Blacktype, thought a little humor was needed right there… but I actually like him for 2nd or 3rd.
Speaking of important three year old races coming after the Triple Crown the Haskell Stakes is shaping up as a very good contest at this point…the Kentucky Derby winner and third place Preakness runner (Mage), the Blue Grass winner and Belmont third place runner (Tapit Trice) along with Geaux Rocket Ride and others. In fact, five of the entries are coming off wins in their last start and that’s not counting the aforementioned top two.
The assortment of trainers will include Cox, Pletcher, Assmusen, Elizabeth Dobles etc…
Oh, can’t forgot Baffert has a horse, Arabian Knight, entered. Baffert, who has won this race a record nine times, just worked AK four days ago at SA in 1:11 flat for six.
This race may put some seperation into the top tier of three year olds going forward.
It looks like one of the weakest Haskells of recent years, the Derby winner notwithstanding.
Roy, four words to answer your ” one of the weakest Haskell’s of recent years” ……. and those four words are …. Baffert and Arabian Knight !!!
BTW …. Paulick Report has an absolutely stunning photo right now of Arabian Knight …. Look of Eagles
Really? Looks like some good horse flesh, to me..
The DRF (Marcus Hersh) just released his comments saying that this year’s Haskell is ‘the most interesting, deepest in years’. Apparently, some don’t see it that way.
Must be trying to “hype” the race. I thought last years race was deeper and a better field.
Yes! I forgot last year’s race. Early senility! Cyberknife was the Arkansas Derby winner. Taiba was the Santa Anita Derby winner. White Abarrio was the Florida Derby winner. And Jack Christopher was the Woody Stephens and Champagne stakes winner. But alas, no winner of the TC races was in last year’s Haskell.
Actually, Hersh asked “Is it just me, or is this the most interesting, deepest Haskell in years?” Interesting….who knows what that means. Deepest in years…That’s absurd. Maybe he means “in the last couple of years.” He apparently hasn’t reviewed many Haskell fields of the past 10 or 20 years. The 2016 Haskell had the Derby AND Preakness winners and Gun Runner. The 2011 Haskell had the Derby and Preakness winners, the Florida Derby winner Ice Box, and First Dude. That said, the Haskell is usually more like this year’s running, not very deep.
Like I said a lot of “hype” . I think a lot of trainers here were sending in there 2nd stringers ( except for Mage and Geaux Rocket Ride) because they just don’t know how good Baffert’s Arabian Knight is. In a little over 24 hours we will all know.
Well this is a hoot.
Art Collector was on the HISA suspension list for violating intrarticular injection rule but was allowed to race anyway.
Between this, the Ray Handel oops sorry episode, and the guilty until proven innocent mentality, HISA has some seious twaking of the rules to do before they get totally out of control.
“Twaking” is right!
Total “understatement ” Steve
I understand Art Collector is passing on The Whitney….and is running at Charles Town..
Not surprised at that as Art Collector (AC) and Cody’s Wish (CW) are both trained by Mott and I feel CW is just a step ahead of AC. Besides AC will probably face weaker at Charlestown and gives Mott a chance to win 2 instead of just one. Wish Baffert could have had Taiba (horse has not worked since June) ready for the Whitney. Not sure if he will be pointing DEFUNDED for Whitney or going to keep him at Del Mar and point him for the Pacifica Classic?
Probably run in San Diego….although…..Defunded didn’t fare well, at Del Mar last Summer….he’s as good as any older horse in the country except for Cody—and Cody has distance questions..maybe he gets sent to Saratoga…
1 CODY’S WISH (27)5-H2-2-0-03151
2 ELITE POWER (5)5-H2-2-0-02712
3 CLAIRIERE5-M3-2-1-02203
4 WEST WILL POWER6-H4-2-1-11674
5 UP TO THE MARK4-C5-4-0-11595T
6 IN ITALIAN5-M2-2-0-01425T
7 DEFUNDED5-G4-2-1-11337
8 CARAVEL6-M3-3-0-01168
9 ART COLLECTOR6-H3-1-2-0499
10 GOODNIGHT OLIVE5-M3-2-0-13610
Latest NTRA top ten.
Not one 3 year old in top 10.
Interesting that 4 of 10 are mares.
Speaks volumes I think about the state of horse racing in America today.
I cant think of a 3yo more accomplished than any of thse horses. Hopefully that wll change after the Haskell and Jim Dandy.
Truer words were never spoken … Steve. This 3 years old group has a lot to prove. I would add the Travers to the other two.
Trust you, Steve, to write a column that doesn’t shout “what’s up with these jerks!?” (which is my feeling). You’ve obviously hit a nerve in your masterfully subtle way, judging from the many interesting comments made below. It’s a cliché to say “more study is needed,” but what are we to make of changes in a breed where a Grade 1 winner (in Australia, no less) was returned to the track after TWENTY PERCENT of his foals had “unusual flaws” — such as missing tails. That’s the backstory on Shellscrape, whose pedigree looks pretty typical — only inbred to Australian champion Vain (3×5) and Northern Dancer (4×5).
Found this a couple of nights ago on Pedigree Query. (Yes, I know they are anonymous notes, but I am DYING to hear feedback from Lynda and Davids on this.
Ms B, horses born without tails is an anomaly but it does happen more often than we might think.
It actually happens quite often in donkeys.
The big problem for the horse is not having a tail to swish at flies.
I looked this horse up and some of his progeny where winners. There are multiple articles out there about him.
Guessing of course, but it seems the owner made the decision to retire him from stud duties and return him to the track because the horse uses its tail supposedly to balance itself. I can find no scientific research or study to support that theory.
There are over 20 diseases and syndromes that are genetic in origin. Most usually result in the death or euthanasia of the foal shortly after birth. Fortunately there are tests available for most of these diseases and conditions that can identify the stallion or the mare as a carrier.
HYPP or Hyperkalemic Periodic Paralysis is one such disease in Thoroughbreds and in Quarter Horses. This is a mutant gene that causes an excess of potassium in the blood that resukts in extreme contraction of muscles. HYPP can cause sudden collapse and death. It is possible that some of these horses that drop dead might have HYPP. I do not know of any genetic testing is performed during the necropsies of the horses that die suddenly on the track or in training. The most famous horse that carried this mutant gene was a QH stallion named Impressive. He was a very popular stallion and since AQHA allows AI, he sired thousands of foals.
Lynda, you are a fount of wisdom and information! I had never heard of such a thing, but with so much commercial breeding of one strain, there are bound to be anomalies like horses without tails. Hopefully not too many horses with three heads, but I would think not having a tail must be really humiliating for any horse — and yes, the flies would be a real bother.
Thank you Ms B.
I attribute most of my knowledge about breeding horses, genetically transmitted conditions and diseases to my two dear friends.
Between the two of them, they had over a hundred years experience breeding Arabian horses. One did outcross breeding of her Arabian mares to get Dutch Warmbloods (she lives in Virginia). The other bred for performance horses; distance riding like the Tevis, cross country. This friend managed two large Arabian farms just outside of Lexington. The one farm bred racing Arabians. This same farm was on the forefront of AI, in utero fertilization and using surrogate mares.
Sadly they are both now in advanced stages of Alzheimers and I so miss our conversations about bloodlines, breeding, conformation etc.
They both had a breeding philosophy that you breed to improve the mare. The broodmare band was the heart of all their operations. Both could do a visual picture in their mind about what a foal would look like by laying a mental image of the stallion of the mare.
Go mage ! And as always Steve thanks for your wonderful Columns !! Sadly for your demographics I was there live convenience vs typecast match race what a race !
I think it was 8 days after her tough loss, Typecast beat Cougar II by a nose, in the Hollywood Turf Invitational..
The glory days of horse racing ! Although can’t wait till the Haskell !!
Typecast had a terrific 1972! I saw her in person, slender bay was all class..
Just read a DRF article about trainer Dallas Keen. He is retiring from training to work full time, along with his wife, retraining and rehoming off the track thoroughbreds. Sounds like one of the good guys. One good thing about getting older, you should get some perspective. Racing, at its best, should be about the connection of people to horses.
Donna and Dallas are both great people. They have done so much to rehabilitate and rehome OTTBs.
I think Donna will have a few horses that will continue racing but they will or may have already been moved from California to a trainer in Texas.
I think we will see growth in Thoroughbred horse racing in Texas in the future.
Already a number of Arabian races held there every year.
Yeah, I know, most people think Arabians are too slow. However they do have long careers, race successfully until 8, 9 or 10. They are not retired at age 3 and hustled off to the breeding shed to make big bucks for the stud farms.
I met them when they wre at the Derby one year. Very nice people.
Steve, your thoughts about the newly formed National Thoroughbred Horse Racing League?
I’ll hav to see it in action before fully uinderstanding the concept. I guess it could be fun.
Steve, I remember being at a 90s seminar where Larry Bramlage was one of the guest speakers. Bramlage thought that too many colts with poor conformation, distance limitations were going to stud in the US; of the three leading sires of the time, controversially, Bramlage stated he would have cut both Storm Cat, and Rahy, leaving A.P. Indy as an entire.
Breeding speed to speed along with poor conformation has resulted with a poorer US racehorse compared to those of the past when competing in Classic races. Something that really stuck out in Gai Waterhouse’s mind when observing the US racehorses was how thin boned US horses were compared to the Australian thoroughbred.
The above negatives, plus raceday medications have impacted accordingly. US dirt tracks with sharp turning corners are extremely injurious to a horse that is not built to fit the part.
Source document for this speech?
Probably a Jockey Club Round Table Conference, I’m sure the Jockey Club has the data available on their website. Enjoy the research.
Thankfully Dr Bramlage was not in the position of making the decision to geld or castrate (we do not use the term “cut”) Storm Cat.
In spite of his one conformation fault (offset knees) and sometimes cantankerous attitude) he was a major influence on the Thoroughbred. He passed on his powerful build, strong hip, stamina and competitive spirit to both his stallions and mares.
Without Storm Cat there would not have been Giant’s Causeway, Scat Daddy, Shared Belief, American Pharoah, Justify, Honor Code, Flightline, Tabasco Cat and the list goes on and includes horses in Ireland and Japan.
One can study the pedigree of most any successful Thoroughbred in the United States and Storm Cat appears as many as 5 times in many of them.
Horse racing in the United States has a lot of problems, but the sire and broodmare sire Storm Cat is not one of them.
I have a lot of respect for Dr Bramlage. He pioneered a plate surgery technique that saved the lives of many stallions and mares. I think he has pinpointed the reasons for many of the fracture scenarios that happen quite often: bone bruising and training methods used today being the most notable.
Even the best vets, physicians in the world get it wrong and in this case, if indeed he said that Storm Cat should have been gelded, he got it wrong.
Terlingua could have been sent to a sounder stallion, such as Alleged, who I think stood at the same farm as Storm Bird. Alleged had iffy knees, but not so bad as Storm Cat’s, and Storm Bird often sired horses with breathing problems too. Alleged also shared the same female family as Secretariat (Cinquepace), Storm Cat’s damsire, and his stamina could have offset all the speed from Crimson Saint and Bolero.
Large field sizes have been suggested as a reason for more lackluster Derby winners. However, between 1923 and 1937, 8 fields had 18-22 starters. Included in those 8 fields were Derby winners and future Hall of Famers Zev, Black Gold, Reigh Count, Omaha, and War Admiral. There may be a number of reasons for the relevancy problem, but I doubt that field size is one of them.
I dont know if it is or not but remember horses way back were in crops of 1.500 and 5,000 later on and had little competition. They didnt have 18-22 horse fields where every horse in the field won or placed in major stakes. Lots of bad horses in those big fields.
From time to time, I look back at the fields of more recent derbies and find that many, in retrospect, were quite weak. Anyway, this is a thought-provoking discussion. Thanks!
70+. Life long racing fan I have wondered about the Importance of the derby as well. I think that Churchill Downs is a mess right now with so many deaths on the track that they moved to Ellis and their continued feud with Bob. But things change, racetracks continue to close and I’m not sure about the future of Horse racing period. However as long as I am alive I will continue to enjoy. I always read your writings and enjoy them immensely. Thank you Steve for another great column.
Thank you very much. Kenny. I appreciate the kind words. Racing is run by two great white sharks, but CD has the bigger teeth. But Stronach can be pretty deadly, as they just showed by devouring Golden Gate and spitting it out, gutting racing in San Francisco so SA can have a few normal sized fields. They killed the smaller fish to feed the big one.
Read that today. Sadly another track closing down.
Not convinced that will save Santa Anita.
Thank you for mentioning GGF, Steve. First Arlington, and now this. To lose both my childhood track and my current “home track” within two years of each other is almost too much. And think of all the people whose lives will be upended by the closure! One article I read indicated that Cal Expo may increase its racing dates to provide some of the Northern CA coverage GGF used to offer, but Cal Expo is two hours from me. It is possible that after this year, I’ll never attend live racing again, after going to the races off and on for more than fifty years. This makes me very sad.
I dont blame anyone who says theyve had enough and leave CD and Stronach to devour themslves. Other sports build and racing tears down. Good luck surviving.
You have certainly hit the nail on the head.Words of wisdom.as usual Steve
Steve, thanks for calling out the sharks in this industry. I read this column a couple of days ago, but haven’t had time to post. Will do so above.
Personally I think it was a good move by SA. SF has been going down the toilet the last decade, Between the the crime, politics and the animal rights activist I would have said good riddance long time ago just like a lot of other major corporations have been doing in that area
For Golden Gate Fields’ fans and, especially, the hundreds of workers at the track whose lives have been turned upside down, it was not a good move at all. See trainer Ellen Jackson’s letter to the editor at the Paulick Report site in which she describes the pointlessness of the decision and the negative impact it will have.
Welll if Golden Gate is such a moneymaker than there should be a line of wanting owners to just go in there and scoop it up !!!! but right now I hear only crickets. BTW l did read the Paulick letter. Yes it is sad but it happens everyday in America and not just in racing.
arlingtonfan, the sale and demolition of Arlington was a real heartbreaker for me.
What a beautiful facility it was. CHD never held a candle to Arlington.
Thanks, Lynda. I’ll never get over that one. Arlington was gorgeous. And you’re right that CHD can’t compare. I actually ended up visiting them within a week of each other in the summer of 2019 and was struck by how much more pleasant Arlington was. The frontside of the track at CD was crammed with seats so that it hardly seemed possible to stand by the rail. Arlington’s frontside was open and spacious, with lovely wooden benches and a view of swaying willow trees in the distance. No comparison.
Hi Steve, sure liked this blog. Yo ur assessments were pretty spot on IMO. Definitely lots of food for thought. We have discussed on your postings for a long time that a 20 field compromises the integrity of Derby. Jockeys are so focused on getting into the right position during the race that I believe hinders a horses chance to win. For me, the Derby has lost much of its luster. I think the Belmont Stakes has over taken the Derby as the more prestigious race. That extra 5 weeks in between the two races is huge for these young 3 year olds.
Mostly though its is the way horse racing has been trending, for several years. Every time we get a budding star he is shipped off to the breeding shed. Lastly, with all of the issues that Churchill Downs has, hasn’t helped the situation.
If it wasn’t the Derby I wouldn’t another race from Churchill Downs.
Thanks for posting Steve.
Thanks Deacon. You are spot on. But I dont think any of the Triple Crown races are as prestigious as they once were. The Belmont has gone from The Test of the Champion to the Test of the Horse the Breeders Dont Want to Breed to. the Travers is right on its heels.
The Travers & the Santa Anita Derby have always been my 2 favorite races. The 1st race I ever saw was the 1955 Santa Anita Derby.
Great memories going to Santa Anita & Hollywood Park in those days.
The Travers: That duel between Jaipur & Ridan, the 1967 Travers with Damascus. Him running in my opinion arguably one of the top 5 races in racing history. Silver Spoon winning the 1959 Santa Anita Derby. That was the year I met Robert Wheeler.
Majestic Prince’s Santa Anita Derby win. I am blessed that I, & all of your other fellow bloggers get to relive all these great memories through your writings. Steve, you are one of the last great historical connections we have regarding race horses.
I definitely appreciate evry Monday………
Thanks again Deacon, but its only us old timers who comment on the hsitorical columns. The younger generation couldnt care less and never ever show up here. Very discouraging and I will have to cut down on the historical columns.
The Derby has lost some of its luster since it has permitted twenty horses in the starting gate. Too many potential champions have lost all possibility of winning the Derby shortly after the race begins. Following a disappointing showing in the Derby, a horse may skip the Preakness and Belmont altogether.
Obviously, this is the opinion of one person only, but I’ll illustrate it using the 2023 Derby as an example. My pick was the Japanese horse who wore the #17 saddle towel. His previous races seemed to indicate he preferred a more forward, if not front-running, racing style. After a poor break and a questionable decision by his jockey, he languished at the rear of the pack going in to the first turn. He was taken to the outside entering the far turn and began to rally but could not sustain his run. Given to much to do, he flattened out and finished 6th. He was compromised at the start, as are too many horses in a field of that size. You have the knowledge, Steve, to counter my argument. Give me a ten horse field in the Derby. Let accomplished horses show what they are capable of doing.
The Derby used to have as many as 20 and once 23 horses and as few as 8. Back then the strength of the top 3yos dictated the size of the field. They had 8 in 1969 because Majestic Prince, Arts and Letterrs. Top Knight, and Dike were in a class by themselves and it turnd out to be a sensational and formful race. I agree about this year. The Japaneese horse lost all chance at the start. Too much focus now on getting points and not enough using the preps as preps.
Steve, you nailed it.
Too much focus on points and not using them as preps.
It seems today’s trainers and their owners go one of two ways. They collect 50 points which is a guarantee usually that the horse is in or they hold back and gamble on winning a 100 point race.
Then they chill for the rest of the time until the race.
I really dislike saying this because I do not want anyone to think I am picking on one or two particular trainers but the trainers today and the last 20 years are just not as good as the trainers in the past.
Horses in any horse sport gain experience when they compete, they learn to use their minds and it strengthens bone and stamina.
Lynda, never dislike or regret telling the truth. You NAILED IT
Steve, i honestly believe the overriding issue is the overly large fields.. add in the type and amount of luck to get thru a field that large, especially by horses that maybe have squeaked in, but are really entered to provide a party for the owners friends. In 1974, the year of Cannonade and the 23 horse field caused the future limiting of fields to 20, gradually the owners became less afraid of running against the likes of Slew, Affirmed, Spectacular Bid.. ALL of which, i ppsit would have drawn much larger fields had they been run today.
Cannonade should never have beaten Little Current in triple crown races
Little Current had a nightmare trip and wound up without exaggeration 15 wide turning fo home. He closed fast in the stretch to finish 5th and then won the Preakness and Belmont by 7 lengths.
Another dinosaur here. Out of curiosity, how do the Travers stats compare to the Derby stats in the same timeframes? Do the midsummer Derby winners get into the hall of fame with greater frequency than the Kentucky Derby winners?
The last Travers winner to be elected to the Hall of Fame was Point Given who raced in 2001. Then it wass Holy Bull in 1994 and Easy Goer in 1989 so it was the same 3 HOF horses in 33 years.
Isn’t Arrogate in the Hall of Fame?
Yes this year. So he is the last. So that’s 4 in the last 33 years
Point Given is one of my favorites!
So Midsummer derby isn’t any better at HOF horses and there are no 20 horse fields there. Sad that most good 3 year olds aren’t allowed to run as older horses. With the small number of races in a career it’s amazing that any colts make it into the HOF. How many people will remember Mage, National Treasure, and Archangelo a few years from now? Probably not many.
It has been only 26 years since the great Triple Crown series led by Silver Charm. Silver Charm, Captain Bodgit, Free House, and Touch Gold all ran like warriors and kept showing up. Silver Charm refused to lose the Preakness while Touch Gold endured the trip from hell. In the Belmont, Touch Gold, maybe the most talented of the group, outfinished Silver Charm while racing on 3 feet and some glue. Horses just don’t do that now. Not sure if the horses can’t or the connections won’t, but something is lost.
Touch Gold was much the best in the Preakness. Plus he got stopped cold twice.
Probably a poor time to offer any praise of the never popular Frank Stronach, but i do remember him being a very gracious and humble winner when his Touch Gold took the triple crown from the ever popular Silver Charm, much as Marylou Whitney and Nick Zito were several years later when Birdstone beat Smarty Jones.
I just read your entire article, and while enjoying it immensely, have not yet recovered from one sentence. Has it been a decade since the phenom of Pharoh? Say it isn’t so.
Well actually 8 years and 9 for Chrome so it ain’t so quite yet.
If anyone posting or even reading here is under 50 please let yourself be known. Under 40, you’re getting the hang of it. Under 30 can you supply documentation? Under 20, I don’t believe you. But if you are telling the truth, can I adopt you?
LOL
Do we get a merit badge for watching Northern Dancer win the Derby or just be happy with Social Security!
The great Northern Dancer, one of my favorite horses and a better sire. He had grat competition in his Derby win, Hill Rise, The Scoundrel, Roman Brother, Quadrangle & Wil Rad. That for me, was an exciting Derby.
For Carry Back but not quite Northern Dancer. we’ll both have to make do with S S
Does reading about Carry Back in the Sunday newspapers count?
I read somewhere about Best Pal having run many high Beyer numbers, the 1990 foal crop was over two times larger than the 2020 crop..
Like the angle you took on this piece. For me (a walking dinosaur) superstardom is only achieved with a body of work which is lacking these days. I’ve always thought that Real Quiet had a shot at it and it was a shame he got sidelined for 9 months. Pegram and Baffert definitely hit a grand slam with that $17,000 yearling.
Derek, welcome to Jurassic Park. I always hope to arract some puppy dogs and kitty cats here, but they want no part of us dinosaurs, even though we are all plant eaters here and very gentle. I guess they feel curiosity about history will kill the cat.
I got K9’s in my dentures, so I guess I’m a TRex (one of my fav bands)
LOL. Steve, I love your sense of humor.
Steve, I think that the person who commented on your FB page nailed it.
Wish she would post on here.
Lol. I relayed that to her. Maybe you have inspired her.
The Chrome movie could end with Derby roses… but his story….about two guys who dreamed—-and produced a backyard breeding plan which resulted in a trip to the top of the mountain…..suffers from a lack of emphatic characters, besides the horse himself…
The final loss of Chrome does not matter, really…..nobody remembers the many races Exterminator had to endure, in his owner’s attempt to wrest away the money title from Man O War—-(whose owner ducked a match up at Saratoga in 1920, a race Exterminator won.). …Old Bones was past his prime and was badly beaten as he finally passed Big Red’s money total with a 4th place finish, at age nine….
You cant end it with the Kentucky bDrby when he won the Preakness two weeks later and then won a ton of other races. Not sure what you mean by lack of emphatic characters. The owners are a story and the trainer certainly is a story, Maybe the owners were not sympathetic characters that the audience would embrace but their story is very compelling.
Thank you Steve. Chrome is indeed a compelling story as is Art Sherman, his trainer.
And who doesn’t love Art and his story, bringing Swaps into the picture.
Bringing up the mention of Swaps is very compelling. Plus the connection with Chrome & Art Sherman.
Art may be a fossil but he’s one of my people. I truly enjoyed listening to him speak.
Yes I meant the owners…certainly Alan Shermn and Victor Espinoza (quite a character!) Would spice things up, I recall decades ago when Victor rode Early Pioneer, in the Hollywood Gold Cup he dyed his hair gold—then he won, at a high price ….but sure, you could end things with The Derby, that itself is a terrific story….
And of course Art…..but movies take all kinds of story license—Seabiscuits making a Zenyatta like run to victory in his final race is fiction, he was sitting right off the lead…..
I still think Chrome’s story would make a great movie. But unfortunately there’s no audience under 50 for it anymore.
Steve,
Thanks for this thought provoking article. Too bad there isn’t a great answer. I think lightly raced 3 year olds may be part of the issue, but how about “the need for speed” also being a problem. I personally am not interested in those early fast fractions for races longer than 7 furlongs, what’s the point unless you’re rabbiting for another horse in the barn?
Looking forward to next week’s article.
The need for speed definitely is a problem that aint going away.
Jo Anne, I am in agreement with you regarding this need for speed and lightly raced horses.
I know the speed numbers are important to handicappers but are they really to the casual fan, the $2 bettor?
To quote Dr J Trotter (Richard Dreyfus) in Let It Ride, “If there’s no betting, there’s no racing!”…
Thing is Matthew that most horses racing today do not have the stamina to race at these speeds more than once a month if that.
I personally find closers to more exciting to watch that what comes across as a one trick pony wiring the and getting those high speed figures.
I like to see competition, several horses going for the wire.
We still see it in International races on turf in England, Japan, Ireland etc.
Most exciting race I have watched recently was Equinox, coming from a bad start, going 8 wide in the turn and winning the race in a field of at least 20.
Now to me that is true horse racing.
Stamina, Stamina, Stamina for me!
Spot on.
The list of memorable Derby winners for me in the 21st century is short– Funny, Smarty, Barbaro, Bird, Chrome, and Pharoah. They all had stories and personalities. Funny was a pretty good racehorse, Smarty’s Belmont a heartbreaker, Barbaro too (and he could, should have been a very good racehorse). Bird was a great story and always will be. Chrome kept running and winning, and so did Pharoah. I exclude Justify because he was the second in a weird category of won-a-few-races-spectacularly and vanished to stud; the others are Mineshaft, Arrogate, and Flightline.
The others? Ranging through never ran again, unsuccessful racing, moderate racing success (no Hall of Famers here), to moderate stud success. Several have gone overseas because they were not instantly siring champions or had ‘unfashionable’ pedigrees.
It’s a strange ol’ world, always.
The column had nothing to do with memorable and good stories. There were plenty of those.
I withdraw my comment on stories, and stick by the few who kept on being good racehorses after their Derby/Triple Crown runs: Funny Cide, California Chrome, And American Pharoah.
Good thought provoking material Steve. Probably the biggest reason as to your question about the ‘revelancy of the Kentucky Derby as strictly as horse race’ is that the KD mght be just another prep race in the year because of the loss of prep races for three year olds over the years.
Just at Santa Anita there is no longer the San Miguel Stakes (Linda’s Chief), San Jacinto Stakes (Majestic Prince) and Los Feliz Stakes just to name a few.
Thanks John. It will never be te same without horses starting off the year in spints like every great and all-time great did in the past.
I’m excited to be the first commenter! Wow, Steve, the fact that only three Derby winners in the past 33 years got into the Hall of Fame is pretty telling. I also appreciated the point you made about why California Chrome’s story didn’t fit neatly into a movie format; I’d never considered that!
Looking forward to your column on Funny Cide next week. Thanks for keeping the spirit of racing alive.
Thanks very much, and for being the first to comment.